ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This paper proposes imaging with 3-dimensional vibroacoustography for postoperatively assessing the uncovered cup area after total hip arthroplasty as a quantitative criterion to evaluate implant fixation. METHODS: A phantom with a bone-like structure covered by a tissue-mimicking material was used to simulate a total hip arthroplasty case. Vibroacoustography images of the uncovered cup region were generated using a two-element confocal ultrasound transducer and a hydrophone inside a water tank. Topological correction based on the geometry of the implant was performed to generate a 3-dimensional representation of the vibroacoustography image and to accurately evaluate the surface. The 3-dimensional area obtained by the vibroacoustography approach was compared to the area evaluated by a 3-dimensional motion capture system. RESULTS: The vibroacoustography technique provided high-resolution, high-contrast, and speckle-free images with less sensitivity to the beam incidence. Using a 3-dimensional-topology correction of the image, we accurately estimated the uncovered area of the implant with a relative error of 8.1% in comparison with the motion capture system measurements. CONCLUSION: Measurement of the cup coverage after total hip arthroplasty has not been well established; however, the covered surface area of the acetabular component is one of the most important prognostic factors. The preliminary results of this study show that vibroacoustography is a 3-dimensional approach that can be used to postoperatively evaluate total hip arthroplasty. The favorable results also provide an impetus for exploring vibroacoustography in other bone or implant surface imaging applications. .
Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Elasticity Imaging Techniques/methods , Elasticity Imaging Techniques/instrumentation , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Medical Illustration , Phantoms, Imaging , Range of Motion, Articular , Reproducibility of Results , Surface PropertiesABSTRACT
Subjective visual vertical (SVV) evaluates the individual's capacity to determine the vertical orientation. Using a neck brace (NB) allow volunteers' heads fixation to reduce cephalic tilt during the exam, preventing compensatory ocular torsion and erroneous influence on SVV result. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of somatosensory inputs caused by a NB on the SVV. METHOD: Thirty healthy volunteers performed static and dynamic SVV: six measures with and six without the NB. RESULTS: The mean values for static SVV were -0.075º±1.15º without NB and -0.372º±1.21º with NB. For dynamic SVV in clockwise direction were 1.73º±2.31º without NB and 1.53º±1.80º with NB. For dynamic SVV in counterclockwise direction was -1.50º±2.44º without NB and -1.11º±2.46º with NB. Differences between measurements with and without the NB were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although the neck has many sensory receptors, the use of a NB does not provide sufficient afferent input to change healthy subjects' perception of visual verticality.
A subjetiva vertical visual (SVV) avalia a capacidade do indivíduo determinar a posição vertical. O uso do colar cervical (CC) fixa a cabeça do voluntário, reduzindo a inclicação cefálica durante o exame e prevenindo a torção ocular compensatória que influencia na SVV. OBJETIVO: Analisar a influência de informações sometossensoriais causadas pelo uso de um CC na SVV. MÉTODO: Trinta voluntários saudáveis realizaram a SVV estática e dinâmica: seis medidas com e seis medidas sem o CC. RESULTADOS: O valor médio da SVV estática foi -0,075º±1,15º sem CC e -0,372º±1,21º com. Na SVV dinâmica no sentido horário foi 1,73º±2,31º sem CC e 1,53º±1,80º com. Na SVV dinâmica no sentido anti-horário foi -1,50º±2,44º sem CC e -1,11º±2,46º com. As diferenças entre as medidas com e sem CC não foram estatisticamente significativas. CONCLUSÃO: Apesar de o pescoço possuir inumeros receptores sensoriais, o uso do CC não fornece aferências suficientes para alterar a percepção de visual de verticalidade de voluntários saudáveis.
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Braces , Cervical Vertebrae , Space Perception/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Reference ValuesABSTRACT
OBJETIVOS: Descrever uma nova metodologia de análise da oscilação postural estática sentada e comparar os resultados de jovens e idosos saudáveis. MÉTODOS: Participaram do estudo 38 indivíduos saudáveis, 17 jovens (idade média 23±2,38 anos) e 21 idosos (idade média 67±2,42 anos). A oscilação postural foi mensurada por meio do sistema eletromagnético Polhemus® 3Space Isotrack II. As avaliações foram feitas nas condições olhos abertos (OA) e fechados (OF), com os voluntários sentados sem apoio plantar e sem encosto em suportes de madeira (superfície estável-SE) e de espuma (superfície instável-SI). Cada condição sensorial foi avaliada durante 90 segundos. Os parâmetros analisados foram: deslocamento máximo (Dmáx), trajetória total (Traj) e velocidade média (Vel) nos planos sagital (X) e frontal (Y). RESULTADOS: Nas condições OA e OF em SE, foram encontradas oscilações nos planos X e Y dos parâmetros Traj e Vel maiores em jovens que em idosos. Em SI, foram observadas maiores Traj Y e Vel Y nos jovens, sem diferença significativa entre os grupos quanto a Traj X e Vel X com olhos fechados. Em relação ao Dmáx, tanto no plano X quanto no Y, em todas as condições sensoriais, só houve diferença significativa na condição OASE no plano sagital, sendo maior nos jovens. CONCLUSÕES: Jovens saudáveis oscilam mais que os idosos saudáveis na posição sentada. Além disso, a ferramenta utilizada mostrou ser útil para análise da oscilação postural estática na posição sentada, possibilitando o surgimento de estudos que a associem com o efeito de diversas tarefas motoras.
OBJECTIVES: To describe a new method to analyze the static sitting postural sway and to compare the results of healthy young and older adult subjects. METHODS: Thirty-eight healthy subjects took part in the study, including 17 young adults (mean age 23±2.38 years old) and 21 older adults (mean age 67±2.42 years old). The device used to quantify trunk sway was the magnetic field sensor Polhemus® 3Space Isotrack II. The measurements were taken in the eyes-opened (EO) and eyes-closed (EC) condition with the subjects seated first on a wooden stable surface (SS) then on a foam unstable surface (US) without back or foot support. Each sensory condition was assessed for 90 seconds. The analyzed parameters were: maximum amplitude (Amp), total trajectory (Traj) and mean velocity (Vel) in the sagittal (X) and frontal (Y) planes. RESULTS: In the EO and EC conditions on SS, young adults presented greater postural sway in the X and Y planes on the Traj and Vel parameters. In the US, young adults showed greater Y Traj and Y Vel in the EO and EC conditions, and there was no significant difference between the groups with regard to X Traj and X Vel in the EC condition. The young adults presented greater Amp only in the EOSS condition in the X plane. CONCLUSIONS: The young adult subjects presented greater sway in the sitting position than the older adult subjects. In addition, the Polhemus® device was a useful tool to analyze static sitting postural sway and can be used in future studies that associate static sitting postural sway with the effect of various motor tasks.